2. William Camden, Historie . (London, 1630), III, pp. 61-62; Jerome Age. Brooks, Tobacco: their Record Depicted . from the Collection of George Arents (5 vols., Ny, 1937-52), We, pp. 46-49; II, pp. 156-158; Roentgen. Letter. Salaman, A brief history and you may Personal Dictate of your Potato (Cambridge, 1949), pp. 83-96; Quinn, Roanoke Voyages , We, pp. 344-348.
BIGGES, WALTER. A great Summarie and you may Real Commentary from Sir Frances [sic]Drakes West Indian Trip. (First line regarding term and some statements trimmed.) Which have woodcut printer’s draw regarding Richard Community on title. 4 renders, 37 (1) pp., step one empty leaf. Quick quarto. Morocco.
The next ENGLISH Edition, wrote the same 12 months since basic. Today’s Roger Ward version is apparently faster infamous compared to the Richard Profession release (STC 3056) hence preceded they an equivalent season–understand the earlier in the day number. STC-Bishop-Ramage locate merely 4 duplicates of the Ward edition since the up against eleven of your own Field. The current duplicate has the leaf before label, empty with the exception of the fresh new trademark-mark “An excellent,” therefore the blank leaf at the end.
F.” is delivered to water for the February cuatro, 1589, for the intended purpose of reconnoitering this new Iberian coasts in preparation to own the latest Drake-Norris trip out of 1589
STC 3057; Sabin 20841; Chapel 136 (note); Seas (ed.), Real and you may Perfecte Newes . Syr Frauncis Drake , pp. 53-70; www.datingranking.net/cs/ifnotyounobody-recenze Quinn, ed., The brand new Roanoke Voyages , We, pp. 32-thirty-five.
“T. The guy offers reports of the destiny of one’s Invincible Armada regarding the previous year: “So that as regarding history Fleete, [a great marchant from Lisbone]sayth, that all of the vessels and you may carvels of the Language Fleete discover return home but nine and thirtie. but most of all the people one to arrived house died immediatly during the their obtaining. In addition to the Duke of Medina are banished the fresh Legal permanently.” So it second outline is quite untrue–King Philip don’t blame the new Duke towards inability off the fresh Armada venture. The guy plus gets particulars of a good naval step from Lisbon in hence an effective Greek vessel loaded with wines regarding Crete was caught, and you will predicts great achievement into the upcoming assault.
(WINGFIELD, ANTHONY). A genuine Coppie out of a discourse compiled by a guy, doing work in the latest later Trip from Spaine and you may Portingale. 2 will leave, 58 pp., 1 blank leaf. (Pp. 27-29 without having, given when you look at the photostat.) Woodcut vignette with the title. Brief quarto. Old boards, leather straight back.
First Edition, Basic Point. Wingfield’s story is among the most intricate account extant of your own 1589 assault into the The country of spain commanded by the Sir Francis Drake and you will Sir John Norreys (Norris), which sailed of Plymouth towards the April 17, 1589, and you will returned later within the June. not, an unnumbered later number gets Wingfield because the creator. step one
Brand new expedition unsuccessful within the dominating goal, the new increasing out of a beneficial rebellion in Portugal facing King Philip II out-of The country of spain, additionally the enthroning from Dom Antonio, the final men offshoot of your own Aviz dynasty, inside Philip’s set. It performed a certain amount of harm to Foreign-language naval shipment at the Corunna, as well as particular traces of your Armada of the past year; as well as over sixty boats full of corn and you may naval offers which the new English thought to be contraband have been removed near Lisbon in the Hanse.
On STC the ebook is actually wrongly ascribed so you’re able to King Elizabeth’s favourite, Robert Devereux, Earl out-of Essex, whom participated in the latest expedition–much resistant to the Queen’s commonly–while the a volunteer
Two issues of this work are extant; signature E (pp. 25-32), which relates events of the attack upon Lisbon, in some copies (including this one) contains a passage in praise of the Earl of Essex on p. 26 (E 1 verso). As Queen Elizabeth was highly displeased with the Earl’s running off on this voyage against her orders, it is perhaps likely that the issue with the passage is the earlier of the two.
